The announcements in early January that U2 were parking the release of an intended album and were instead loading their bases to tour ‘The Joshua Tree’ on the occasion of the thirtieth anniversary of it’s issue, won’t have taken regular watchers of the veteran band by surprise. ‘Songs Of Experience’ had initially been touted as a quick-fire follow-up and companion piece to 2014’s ‘Songs Of Innocence’, even if more specific detail wasn’t forthcoming, a tack favoured by a band that, even now, likes to play with a closed hand. ‘Innocence’ was recorded in a myriad of locations by multiple producers and a team of engineers and sounds like it was a real struggle to complete. And so it’s easy to see why the band has re-ordered it’s to-do list: with a big birthday looming, the associated commercial opportunities are simply too attractive to ignore. The line between band and brand is indeed a fine one and U2 have played fast and loose with it for years.
The band has always been as pragmatic as it’s been notoriously driven and competitive, especially in the corporate field. Writing about the ticketing mechanism used for the band’s date in Dublin’s Croke Park next July for instance, Jim Carroll has pointed out in his excellent Irish Times blog, ‘On The Record’ how ‘the same corporate entity is promoting the U2 [Joshua Tree] tour, managing the band, flogging the tickets and operating one of the biggest secondary ticket markets’.
On the day of the announcement of the forthcoming tour, Adam Clayton, the band’s bass player, told Ryan Tubridy on RTÉ Radio One that ‘desperate times’ motivated the band to re-visit ‘The Joshua Tree’ thirty years on. But while many believed he was referring to Donald Trump’s election to the office of American President and the growing sense of global anxiety that’s followed it, he could just as easily have been referencing U2’s creative and critical nose-dive, which started in earnest over ten years ago and which shows no sign of abating. Simply put, U2 have ‘the drabs’ and have been re-cycling bitty old riffs and scraps of familiar lyrical conceits for ages.
It’s not the first time that U2 has shelved a record, of course. The early sessions for what eventually became the band’s 2009 album, ‘No Line On The Horizon’, were started three years beforehand with Rick Rubin, one of the co-founders of the Def Jam label and unquestionably among the most important producers in the history of contemporary popular music. The band’s previous album, ‘How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb’, was an uncomplicated, mildly diverting but ultimately familiar sounding U2 record. And so the prospect of a creative marriage with Rubin on it’s follow-up suggested, fleetingly as it transpired, the sort of possibilities realised a decade previously on the two most lateral of all of U2’s albums, ‘Zooropa’ and ‘Pop’, when the band cut loose while under the influence of producers Flood and Howie B. And paid dearly for the privilege at the hands of critics, who largely panned them, and fans, who rejected them.
But although Rubin’s ‘Beach’ sessions sound far more conventional than one might have expected, the marriage was dissolved quickly and the band returned instead to the more familiar arms of it’s long-time squad of Brian Eno, Daniel Lanois and Steve Lillywhite, aided by a large support cast of assistants and engineers. Rubin clearly wasn’t taken by, or had the patience for, the band’s preferred way of working: riff it out in studio and let’s see what gives. In an interview with Rolling Stone magazine, The Edge claimed that ‘it’s in the process of recording that we really do our writing’. And, with reference to the abandoned Rubin sessions added: ‘we’d almost have to make a record with Brian [Eno] and Daniel [Lanois] first, then go and re-record it with Rick Rubin’. Even to those of us who’d grown accustomed to U2 at half-throttle, this was a pretty exceptional reveal.
Steve Lillywhite had first seen the band work this way during the studio sessions for it’s second album, 1981’s ‘October’. He’d already produced U2’s debut, ‘Boy’, in the relatively modest Windmill Lane facility in Dublin city and was back again behind the desk when an under-prepared band struggled to bring a follow-up record together on the studio floor. U2 have never traded as the most prolific of writers and, having flogged the best of their early material on 1980’s ‘Boy’, found themselves under real pressure to deliver a second album on schedule. But despite helping the band to make an initial splash in Britain, ‘October’ was really no more than a collection of loose ideas and half-imagined words stitched together in studio, a point made by Lillywhite some years back during an interview with the www.atu2.com website. ‘They pretty much exhausted all of their songs on ‘Boy’’, he said. ‘They were touring ‘Boy’ and they used to play ‘I Will Follow’ twice because they didn’t have enough songs. So when it came to doing ‘October’, they didn’t really have very long to prepare it’. And it shows: the title track is Spinal Tap’s ‘Lick My Lovepump’, ‘I Threw A Brick Through A Window’ is a meandering jam, ‘Scarlet’ is random riffing and so on and so forth.
Producers Brian Eno and Daniel Lanois go back with U2 to 1984’s ‘The Unforgettable Fire’ when, during a critical cross-over period in the band’s career, they succeeded in pushing them out of what had already become comfortable territory. They also pushed U2 out into the sticks: the record was laid down, for the most part in the vast, ornate ballroom at Slane Castle in County Meath, and the layers of production and additional sound design on ‘The Unforgettable Fire’ reflect the extent of the surroundings in which slabs of it was conceived. Much of it brought to the table by Eno, in particular.
Barry Devlin’s documentary film, ‘The Making Of The Unforgettable Fire’ is an excellent portrait of a starry-eyed young band at work, especially revealing in how, as early as 1983/84, U2 were approaching the studio recording process and regarding the role of the producer. After three albums and the broader cut-through achieved by ‘War’, which was also produced by Steve Lillywhite, the band had of course earned the right to take a looser, more unhindered approach to studio work. But Brian Eno’s contribution to ‘The Unforgettable Fire’ is vast, none moreso than on ‘Pride’, the record’s signature piece, which he elevates – as seen in Devlin’s film – from a series of sinewy riffs into something far more defined and magical. ‘The Making Of The Unforgettable Fire’ captures Eno variously as producer, mentor, writer, teacher and guru: if Devlin were to document U2 at such close quarters today, what – and who – might he find inside the studio walls ?
In Joshua Klein’s 2009 Pitchfork interview with Eno, filed to mark the 25th anniversary of the release of ‘The Unforgettable Fire’, the producer explained that the band wanted him on that album because they wanted ‘to be changed unrecognisably’. And by effecting that change, Eno and Lanois became fundamental to the scale and extent of U2’s global breakthrough and, consequently, their entire raison d’etre. So much so that by the time the two producers had completed their work on ‘No Line On The Horizon’, they were also finally credited as co-writers and, to all intents, the fifth and sixth members of the group. If, as The Edge had previously explained, it was in the process of recording that the band did it’s writing, then what was it exactly that U2 brought to the studio with them at the start of that project ? Because ‘Horizon’, like ‘Songs Of Innocence’, sounds exactly like a record painted by numbers and laid down by a committee.
U2 wouldn’t be the first, and certainly won’t be the last of the great bands to work in such a manner. Johnny Rogan reveals in ‘Morrissey And Marr : The Severed Alliance’, that much of The Smiths’ finest material came together very quickly during studio sessions, often from half-raw riffs that were vigorously jammed out on the fly. Indeed the band’s long-time producer, Stephen Street, maintains that during the recording of the group’s final album,‘Strangeways, Here We Come’, his input into the string arrangement on ‘Last Night I Dreamt That Somebody Loved Me’ was such that he could have been given a writing credit.
Although The Smiths were only ever together for barely five years, their career – like much of the early part of U2’s – was characterised by a relentless and often reckless touring-recording-touring schedule. ‘Strangeways’, for instance, was recorded off of the back of a long American tour and many of the songs that made it onto that album were seriously under-cooked before the formal sessions began. Its been decades since U2 have had those kind of scheduling problems and time pressures but, from 2000 onwards, they’ve been re-mining the same seam for ever-decreasing returns. And the more that basic songwriting has become an issue, the more desperate – and ultimately cluttered – their sound has become in search of those familiar, big statement pieces.
In that same http://www.atu2.com interview, Steve Lillywhite suggests that the band has consistently asked him back because he brings clarity to what they do. But by their own standards, U2’s recorded output has lacked real clarity and any sort of positive form line since ‘All That You Can’t Leave Behind’, their last truly full-bodied album. And the Cinemascope cut of ‘The Joshua Tree’ that The Edge referred to recently in Rolling Stone magazine is far removed from the wedding video finish of the band’s last three elpees. With U2 cut adrift in the roaring forties, the suite of songs on ‘The Joshua Tree’, must pretty much haunt them now.
The more flaccid and middling U2’s records have become, the bigger and more complicated their accompanying live shows have been: spectacle and scale plastering over the obvious. To that end, the ‘Songs Of Innocence’ tour was essentially ‘U2: The Musical’, a flabby and over- rated theatre show that only really kicked into gear up the final straight when the band dipped into it’s back-catalogue to just about salvage it from the ordinary. And ‘The Joshua Tree’ cabaret is an obvious extension of that broader theme, U2 celebrating themselves and their achievements – some of which are still scarcely believable – under-pinned by the shake and roll of some of their greatest hits.
The ‘Innocence’ tour in Dublin was the first time that the emotional under-lay that usually accompanies their Irish shows wasn’t enough to fully hold the weight of the band’s ambition. Bono’s voice, previously the fulcrum around which every single great U2 moment has resounded, sounded weary and weak, hindered by the lethargic set-list. And from my seat in the stalls, I found it difficult to buy into the giddy hoopla that surrounded the record’s lyrics: in the absence of imposing signature tunes, the autobiographical aspect of the words had attracted much of the critical focus beforehand. But Bono has long dealt in the confessional, themes of childhood, aspects of family life, parenting, adolescence and loss. And far more convincingly so on U2’s earliest records too. By comparison, the likes of ‘Iris’, ‘The Miracle of Joey Ramone’ and ‘Cedarwood Road’ just sound as hollow and incomplete as the most featherweight material on ‘October’, as if they’d been beaten into shape to accompany an elaborate set and lighting design.
A point that was also made over five years previously by the Dublin writer and journalist Michael Ross, who has observed the band at close quarters since it’s inception and has written with terrific insight on U2 over many years. And never more so than in a long feature for The Sunday Times in 2009 following the release of ‘No Line On The Horizon’ – and the opulent live tour that accompanied it – that forensically deconstructed the band’s creative decline using thirty years of personal testimony and first-hand experience to scaffold his thesis. That prescient piece, which is available at atU2.Com is essential for anyone with even a passing interest in the complicated and compelling history of Ireland’s most successful ever rock band, and it was foremost in my mind as I sat watching on in The Point.
I made the mistake of articulating my views on the ‘Innocence’ tour to my companion that night in November, 2015: my wife. Devoted, loyal and steadfast, I pale into insignificance when she turns her focus onto the small matter of U2, with whom she’s been smitten for the guts of thirty years, for better and, this last while, for worse. And I’m still paying the price for my loose tongue. She’ll be there once again come July and, like most other long-standing U2 fans, will travel in good faith, delighted to have stayed the course with them, still fearless in devotion. And why not ?
Croke Park itself – and the organisation to which it belongs, The Gaelic Athletic Association – has changed beyond recognition in the thirty years since she first saw U2 anoint the holy ground to the strains of ‘The Joshua Tree’. The band itself may be caught in a long-term creative torpor but remain one of the most fascinating, infuriating, driven and ambitious acts in the history of popular music. Like the hurlers of Cork, who’ve long lapsed into listlessness, they have tradition and history on their side, even if that’s been eroded slowly over time. And yet, as we’ve seen over the years, they’re at their most lethal and dangerous when they’ve been counted out.
But for now that count continues, steady and backwards.
A very decent piece of considered journalism that. Rare that you read such a critical piece on a bands output over that long a time frame. I enjoyed reading it. I would like to read similar on other contemporaries such as REM and Depeche Mode. Depeche about to launch their form of stadium fueled electro rock again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Michael, appreciate the post and thanks for the kind words. We’ll definitely get to both DM and REM over time, absolutely. All the best, Colm.
Very good summary Colm.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Donal, appreciate that. Probably a bit simplistic overall but time and space etc. I will say this :- I think U2 have a couple of terrific albums in them yet and you’d just love them to cut loose. But songwriting is a serious problem, by the sounds of it. All the best, Colm.
And will you be by her side on that night in July? 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not allowed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
ah go on..
LikeLiked by 1 person
So well written, as always. I like the fact this steers clear of the black or white polarity of the usual discussion of U2, ie hate ’em or overrate ’em. This is what makes your criticisms of the band’s waterthreading all the more damning. I like the fact you do let in a flicker of hope at the end! Maybe they need a Justin McCarthy figure at the helm — get them back to basics!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Enda, very kind of you as usual. They need to get back into the ball-alley with a Justin figure and you know, I wouldn’t put it past them. The thing is, its easy to forget how terrific a band they are. Its some back catalogue by any stretch etc … All the best, Colm.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very good article. Although I’m surprised at no mention of Achtung Baby. For me this was their creative peak – and with one or two moments since (Ms Sarajevo being one example), they’ve been relegated and playing Division 3 hurling since then.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Sean. There’s another U2 piece in the offing that deals with ‘Achtung’ in detail, so never fear. And stay tuned … All the best. Colm
“And paid dearly for the privilege at the hands of critics, who largely panned them, and fans, who rejected them.”
This is a good piece but let down by this odd assertion. I truly don’t know where the idea that fans ‘rejected’ Zooropa and Pop comes from.
Zooropa sold 7 million units. A highly impressive tally for an experimental album that had been released with little fanfare or pre-publicity and while the band were still touring. Its singles got massive rotation on MTV Europe at the time and I am informed by my US friends that Stay (Far Away So Close) got good rotation on college radio and MTV America at the time, in spite of it being perhaps the most ‘European’ track U2 have ever released.
It’s true that Pop’s sales were a bit disappointing, due to the then grunge-obsessed American market being freaked by U2 attempting a Village People pastiche (the video for Discotheque), but 6 million units is still not to be sniffed at . And actually it’s a fan favourite among most of the fans that I know.
As for the critics ‘panning’ Zooropa, a check of Wiki shows that this is also simply incorrect.
Even Pop, while it received mixed reviews, it wasn’t panned.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks very much Walk. I suppose when you’re explaining you’re losing, but …
I think in relation to what went previously, both ‘Zooropa’ and ‘Pop’ – both of which I love, by the way – were real risks and, against the backdrop of U2’s commercial ascent to that point, certainly alienated some of their considerable fanbase. I think the best that can be said about ‘Pop’, in relation to critical analysis [for what that’s worth] is that opinion was divided. I raved about it at the time in print but I can remember the band’s PR corps fire-fighting furiously at one point. And when the early U.S. tour dates were being panned, a terrific rearguard action was waged in Europe. Which resulted in half an hour of ‘PopMart’ being beamed into free-to-air TVs all aover the continent from the Rotterdam date, Which I was at. And which was amazing.
Yes, points taken on the band’s PR corps fighting the rearguard action during the early stages of the Popmart tour. I didn’t mean to snipe in my previous comment, overall it’s a very good piece that you’ve written.
Like yourself I am a very much a fan of the 1990s U2, although I missed out on going to see ZooTV and Popmart due to accursed exams. Didn’t get around to actually seeing them live until 2001 in Slane.
The article you linked to by Michael Ross from 2009, which I don’t think I read at the time, is also a good read, particularly on the sniping between Bono and Larry that we’ve seen in recent years.
Anyway I have saved your blog to my favourites!
Brave, accurate, thoughtful and necessary. The comparison with the Smiths is peerless. – Totally on the money. I have actively hated the band since being bet over the head to like them in school. I could never understand why my teenage pals who thought that The Joshua Tree was any better than all the fantastic music I was listening to at the time. I have a natural personal desire to punch Bono in the face but in fairness – I have regard for Larry and the odd time the Edge when he gets his act together.
I would not put them in the same league as the Cork hurlers – I doubt if any of the four of them ever endured any pressure like a decent training session for hurling or rugby in the driving rain. That disconnect with the people they purport to represent is what rankles. And their laziness and reliance on true geniuses like Eno to take their humdrum sound and make it in any way interesting. I don’t expect a band to be one of us – It’s actually a huge amount of the attraction that they are not – but don’t sell me bull and three chords stolen from Mick Jones.
I started a blog on U2 this morning, and was glad to see there was some good writing like this on the band. Well written and researched.
Cheers Christopher. Delighted you enjoy. What are the details of the blog?
It’s called U2 Brute, and it’s written from the perspective of somebody who’s basically a casual enjoyer of the group, and takes the premise that U2 is a good band who’s also good at being a bad band.
Nice one Christopher. Do you have a link. We can tweet out.
I do! Thank you very much for the offer. https://androzanicriticblog.wordpress.com/
thanks Christopher. have tweeted out there
LikeLiked by 1 person
You have my eternal gratitude.
LikeLiked by 1 person
U2 have always acted like corporate politicians when it came to advancing their career. They’ve always strategized when “advancing” on the next “chapter / album / tour cycle”. As early as 1985, they referred to “:sound checks” as the “money cheques”.
A couple of points to note : McGuinness was the anchor, rock, mentor and fifth member of the band. When McGuinness departed, the bands collective sharp instinct for the next move was lost. No Line On The Horizon was a failure. Larry called the album “No Craic On The Horizon”.
Larry was at loggerheads with McGuinness on the subsequent “360” Tour for his acquiescence to Bono’s instance on the lavish and expensive stage production and its failure to break even so late in the tour. Since his role in stepping down as manager, Mc Guinness has referred in an interview as Mullen being “not as bright” as “Bono & Edge”. Mullen and Clayton agreed a percentage reduction in publishing from 20% to 15% in the early 1990’s. Mullen was in charge of all merchandise which topped him up but that was brought to a close when Live Nation was put in charge. U2’s last deal with Live Nation came to an end in 2020.
Larry has left the band 100%. The strategy is Bono & Edge making numerous ” guest appearances” everywhere, to subtly hammer home the point that its “Bono & Edge” now. The reason they did not get a “celebrity fill in drummer” for the Sphere shows is that they want to deflect every opportunity away from that drum stool as it’s going to create another PR nightmare for them. Some random unknown subservient dutch guy in his mid 30’s will keep quiet. He’s definitely signed NDA’s already.
Hewson and Evans are banking on a very controlled media “duo blitz” – special guest appearances at controlled events. The only hope in hell they have in selling any tickets without Larry is to throw everything including the kitchen sink at the next live presentation. They are now playing their last ever trump card – AB shows at the Sphere. They have nothing to deflect attention away from what’s actually going on after that. If those Sphere shows go well, They will be out on our doing “Arenas” first with Bram, and then seeing where it takes them. If the reviews are good, they will go out with Bram.
This is very dirty, grubby and sinister ending to a once great band. No amount of “big screens” can hide the woeful albums since 2009, the PR own goals (iTunes, Tax Dutch Affairs, Larrygate, Bono speaking at the World Economic Forum, Bush, Blair, Guy Oseary as management).
U2 do not have a young audience. Their audience are mostly in their 40’s. They’ve lost a lot of fans in the U.S.A with their political posturing. They are dealing with diminishing returns now that Larry is gone. I think they well and truly finished as a band.
It’s going to get creepy and dirty watching Bono this time around. Dealing with a founder member leaving the group with some word-salad corporate speak is delusional. It’s like watching a school bus falling off the top a mountain in Peru in slow motion. Horrific, yet I cant look away.
Thanks very much, Simon. An interesting year ahead. It all looks a bit messy already. Colm